From an email:
Here’s some details of the horrid leak history of Enbridge Pipeline, the company that just spilled ~800,000 of crude oil into a river in Michigan.
Note that this is NOT all inclusive of Enbridge’s ruptures!
And, an Enbridge VP Spoke on Capitol Hill a few weeks ago about pipeline safety:
http://transportation.house.gov/Media/file/Rail/20100715/R%20Adams.pdf
He stated:“Going back to a prescriptive “one-size-fits-all” mandate treating all areas along the pipeline and all hazards as equal misses the premise of
risk-management that considers both the likelihood and consequences of an incident.”I’d love to know if that Enbridge rupture point was a HCA.
FYI, look at Rick K.’s Testimony here at the same Hearing:
http://transportation.house.gov/Media/file/Rail/20100715/Kuprewicz%20SubCommittee%20Testimony.pdf
I think that Enbridge needs to be declared a 100% Hazardous Facility, like Colonial Pipeline was in 1996 or so. It lead to a big improvement in Colonial’s safety.To XXXXXX
…Myself, I’m a pipeline safety activist. Enbridge has had a troubling history of leaks & accidents over the years. They had ruptures from bad
batches of steel pipe in in 1974, 1979, 1982, 1986,1989, 1991 and 2002:http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2004/PAR0401.pdf
Note that the 2002 Minn. leak was 6,000 barrels (252,000 gallons) of crude oil, a third of what was released in Michigan.They recently had a leak in Canada on March 31, 2010, that spilled about 1,500 liters of crude oil. In January 2010, they had a pipeline rupture
that spilled 126,000 gallons of crude oil in North Dakota.http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/147254/
In November 2007, 2 workers In Minn. were killed while repairing an Enbridge pipeline:
About Sharon Wilson
Sharon Wilson is considered a leading citizen expert on the impacts of shale oil and gas extraction. She is the go-to person whether it’s top EPA officials from D.C., national and international news networks, or residents facing the shock of eminent domain and the devastating environmental effects of natural gas development in their backyards.
- Web |
- More Posts(5121)
Mike H. says
An interesting news piece about this:
http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20100728/NEWS01/307280012/1002/Enbridge+has+history+with+safety+issues
"According to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Enbridge was cited 31 times since 2002 for (pipeline) safety and inspection violations. They were not the worst offender in that time: BP, for example, was cited 58 times; Chevron was cited 52 times; and Exxon was cited 44 times."