This is a tragic story about Louis Meeks and somebody needs to help this man.
Hydrofracked? One Man’s Mystery Leads to a Backlash Against Natural Gas Drilling
by Abrahm Lustgarten
ProPublica, Feb. 25, 2011
You should read the whole thing. It’s worth the time.
I just want to point out a couple of quotes:
1) He says he has seen methane gas seep underground for more than seven miles from its source. If the methane can seep, the theory goes, so can the fluids. “There is no such thing as impossible,” Coleman says. “Like everything else in life it comes down to the probability.”
2) Dale Henry, a retired petroleum engineer, said that as many as a third of the wells he worked on over his career “lose circulation.” That means that during hydraulic fracturing the pressure didn’t build up the way it should have, because fluids seeped out somewhere on the way down, like a garden hose losing pressure because of punctures. According to Henry, the question is more like, how often does it work properly?
It seems they have never gotten this cementing thing quite right.
Texas Railroad Commission investigated natural gas well surface casing in Wise County. They discovered “114 gas wells didn’t have enough surface casing to protect groundwater and that records about the surface casing had been falsified. LINK
If you can’t get it right, just falsify the records. So mafia-esque.
Another great part of this reporting is where Lustgarten explains that fracking is more than just the the moment of the frack.
The industry’s definition boiled down to lawyerly semantics. It meant that fracturing couldn’t be blamed unless the high pressure inside the well at the moment it was fractured directly caused the contamination. “Hydraulic fracturing related contamination would result if the hydraulic fracturing stimulation is the sole cause of the well integrity to fail,” explained Lee Fuller, the lobbyist for the Independent Petroleum Association of America. According to Fuller’s definition, fracturing would not be the cause if the fracturing fluids were spilled on the surface, or if the fracking waste was improperly disposed of, or even if the cement casing in a well split apart after the enormous pressure of fracking, as has happened in several of the most egregious incidents.
An EPA fracturing expert, Nathan Wiser, put it this way when considering the drilling industry’s limited definition of what constitutes hydraulic fracturing: “You can certainly characterize fracturing as an event that happens on a Tuesday,” he said. “It’s a singular event in that well’s life. But it can expose other weaknesses, and through the extra pressure that is exerted on the well at that time it sort of shakes loose that problem.”
I doubt Louis Meeks gives a frack if his water was contaminated at the exact moment of fracking or during one of the many steps of the fracking. All he knows is he has no water.
About Sharon Wilson
Sharon Wilson is considered a leading citizen expert on the impacts of shale oil and gas extraction. She is the go-to person whether it’s top EPA officials from D.C., national and international news networks, or residents facing the shock of eminent domain and the devastating environmental effects of natural gas development in their backyards.
- Web |
- More Posts(5121)
zoe says
I love Texas…
I hate idiots!
And I mean all idiots that are running(ruining) Texas.
I don't which is going to give me an aneurysm first, the drilling chemicals or reading all of this maddening bull$hit.
zoe says
I don't know where to put this math. I think it's important, and an aspect we are not thinking about.
One of the reasons gas is getting so expensive is because of demand. When the demand is less the price drops.
Do the math: Oops, and I just underestimated it because I found a source that says 93,000 gas wells in Texas. But for fun, lets go with my original number 50,000.
x900 trucks,
x 200 miles driven do dump frac water.
= 9,000,000,000 gallons of diesel fuel.
So ground the gas industry, and gas prices will drop.
I want to know who is looking at the number of fossil fuels that are being depleted on this fabulous 'clean energy'.
I have one word to say, but I certainly can't say it here.
Anonymous says
There was an excellent comment rebutting a pro-driller who stated something to the effect of…there are scientific studies to prove that hydro-fracking is safe….to which a reply was given…how many times has the FDA commissioned a scientific study which proves a drug is safe, only to pull it from the shelves at a later date? It's happened with 100's of drugs. A very good point. Science is good, but it also tends to favor those of us that are patient enough to wait for the ACTUAL results over a long period of time.
Anonymous says
The Feds always find out what they know by hiring some corporatate (or university dude) to study and learn and tell the Feds the answer. Many, many time that info is biased and/or wrong!
TadGhostHole says
ProPublica represent represent